2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1972 Steyr 126
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Steyr 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Steyr 126 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (144 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1972 Steyr 126. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Steyr 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1972 Steyr 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Steyr 126 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Steyr 126. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 6 | 1972 Steyr 126 | |
| Make | Mazda | Steyr |
| Model | 6 | 126 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 1850 mm |
