2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Mini MK III
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mini MK III would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1975 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 903 kg more than 1975 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mini MK III. (61 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1975 Mini MK III | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | 6 | MK III |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 61 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2040 mm |