2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Seat 133

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Seat 133 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (144 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1975 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1975 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Seat 133. (55 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Seat 133.

Compare all specifications: