2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |