2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher.

Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mazda 6 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Mazda Oldsmobile
Model 6 Cutlass
Year Released 2004 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 139 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 5270 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1960 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2850 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]