2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1979 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1979 Talbot 1510. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1979 Talbot 1510. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 433 kg more than 1979 Talbot 1510. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Talbot 1510. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1979 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | 6 | 1510 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 122 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 76.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |