2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1980 Seat 127
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 127 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1980 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1980 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1980 Seat 127 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 6 | 127 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2230 mm |