2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (130 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | 6 | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2160 mm |