2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 6 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | 6 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2160 mm |
