2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 127 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (231 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 6 | Space Runner |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 164 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1218 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2530 mm |