2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Saturn SC
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Saturn SC would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SC. (101 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 468 kg more than 1996 Saturn SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Saturn SC. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1996 Saturn SC | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | 6 | SC |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |