2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Saturn SL
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Saturn SL would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1996 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (221 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Saturn SL. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1996 Saturn SL | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | 6 | SL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |