2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2000 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 441 kg more than 2000 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 6 | 2000 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | 6 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |
