2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 375 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (299 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (231 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: