2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, both 2004 Mazda 6 and 2004 Toyota 4Runner were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 464 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (181 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 383 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 87 L |