2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (138 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 1100 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 6 | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Mazda | Westfield |
| Model | 6 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |
