2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (130 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 885 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | 6 | Nano |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 37 L |