2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi TT weights approximately 470 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 6 | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | 6 | TT |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4178 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1351 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2469 mm |
