2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Citroen C4
To start off, 2010 Citroen C4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C4 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C4 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C4 (241 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (231 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 2010 Citroen C4 | |
Make | Mazda | Citroen |
Model | 6 | C4 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 241 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 12.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1355 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |