2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1101 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 186 kg more than 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Because 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
Make | Mazda | SSC |
Model | 6 | Ultimate Aero |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 6350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 1269 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6075 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1090 mm |