2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Ford Ka

To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ka.

Because 2004 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mazda 6 2012 Ford Ka
Make Mazda Ford
Model 6 Ka
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2261 cc 1297 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 256 HP 68 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 380 Nm 106 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 74.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94 mm 75.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.2:1
Acceleration 0-100mph 6.9 seconds 13.7 seconds
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 3630 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2450 mm