2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 204 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (221 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 51 L |