2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2013 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKS (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln MKS weights approximately 480 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Lincoln MKS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKS (380 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (221 Nm). This means 2013 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 2013 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Mazda | Lincoln |
Model | 6 | MKS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 1916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.4 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 72 L |