2004 Mazda 6 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | 6 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |