2004 Mazda AZ vs. 1982 Lancia Gamma
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Gamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Gamma would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Gamma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lancia Gamma weights approximately 570 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lancia Gamma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Lancia Gamma has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Lancia Gamma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda AZ | 1982 Lancia Gamma | |
| Make | Mazda | Lancia |
| Model | AZ | Gamma |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2680 mm |
