2004 Mazda AZ vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Renault 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Renault 9 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Renault 9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda AZ | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | AZ | 9 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2410 mm |
