2004 Mazda AZ vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 105 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda AZ | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | AZ | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2550 mm |