2004 Mazda AZ vs. 1996 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 205 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda AZ | 1996 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | AZ | Polo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2410 mm |