2004 Mazda AZ vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1103 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda AZ | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | AZ | Charger |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 368 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1853 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3048 mm |