2004 Mazda AZ vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1047 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda AZ | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | AZ | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2423 mm |