2004 Mazda AZ vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1834 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda AZ | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Mazda | Land Rover |
Model | AZ | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2584 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2878 mm |