2004 Mazda AZ vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1942 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda AZ | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | AZ | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 397 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5639 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1892 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3302 mm |