2004 Mazda B2300 vs. 1966 Mini MK I

To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 828 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.

Compare all specifications: