2004 Mazda B2300 vs. 1972 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1972 Nissan 240 C. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1972 Nissan 240 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 143 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Nissan 240 C. (200 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B2300 | 1972 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | B2300 | 240 C |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2700 mm |