2004 Mazda B2300 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2300. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Because 2004 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda B2300 | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | B2300 | SS |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
