2004 Mazda B2300 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 573 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (107 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B2300 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | B2300 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 107 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |