2004 Mazda B2300 vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac

To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2300. (135 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.

Because 2004 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (310 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (206 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Hac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.

Compare all specifications: