2004 Mazda B2300 vs. 2008 Opel Astra
To start off, 2008 Opel Astra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B2300 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 213 kg more than 2008 Opel Astra.
Because 2004 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Astra. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Astra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B2300 | 2008 Opel Astra | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | B2300 | Astra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1589 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 52 L |