2004 Mazda B2300 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B2300 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2300. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 561 kg more than 2004 Mazda B2300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda B2300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mazda B2300 2010 Jeep Wrangler
Make Mazda Jeep
Model B2300 Wrangler
Year Released 2004 2010
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 3800 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 205 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 325 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1443 kg 2004 kg
Vehicle Length 5130 mm 4684 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 2103 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2946 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.1 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 9.8 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 74 L 82 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]