2004 Mazda B2300 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B2300 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2300. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 314 kg more than 2004 Mazda B2300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (409 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B2300 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | B2300 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 409 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 12.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4955 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |