2004 Mazda B3000 vs. 2002 Renault Grand Espace
To start off, 2004 Mazda B3000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Grand Espace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Grand Espace would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2002 Renault Grand Espace. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Grand Espace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Grand Espace weights approximately 260 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Grand Espace (270 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2002 Renault Grand Espace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B3000 | 2002 Renault Grand Espace | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | B3000 | Grand Espace |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1869 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 270 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 83 L |