2004 Mazda B3000 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. (141 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 275 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B3000 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | B3000 | C |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |