2004 Mazda B3000 vs. 2007 Volvo C30
To start off, 2007 Volvo C30 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volvo C30 (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 31 kg more than 2007 Volvo C30.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2007 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B3000 | 2007 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | B3000 | C30 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 17.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1479 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |