2004 Mazda B3000 vs. 2009 Nissan Qashqai
To start off, 2009 Nissan Qashqai is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Qashqai weights approximately 10 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Qashqai (320 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Qashqai will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B3000 | 2009 Nissan Qashqai | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | B3000 | Qashqai |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 15.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 65 L |