2004 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 40 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (300 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | B3000 | C-Max |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 300 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2788 mm |