2004 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | B3000 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
