2004 Mazda B3000 vs. 2011 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 128 kg more than 2011 Lotus Evora.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Lotus Evora (349 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2011 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda B3000 | 2011 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Mazda | Lotus |
| Model | B3000 | Evora |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1382 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4341 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1222 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2576 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 59 L |
