2004 Mazda B3000 vs. 2012 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Fiat Croma. (145 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2012 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2012 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B3000 | 2012 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | B3000 | Croma |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 62 L |