2004 Mazda B4000 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B4000 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B4000 (207 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B4000 (310 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda B4000 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | B4000 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4031 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2707 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 65 L |
