2004 Mazda B4000 vs. 2012 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B4000 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 05-Sep (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B4000. (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B4000.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 05-Sep (400 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B4000. (323 Nm). This means 2012 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B4000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda B4000 | 2012 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | B4000 | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4031 cc | 2800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5009 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1468 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |